Charting a course to men's health and wellbeing: applying a lens of power and politics to improve men's health outcomes.
Despite long-standing evidence of poor health and life expectancy outcomes among men, particularly among men who are socially or structurally marginalised, men's health has generally received little and uneven attention in health policy and practice. Its gendered and intersectional aspects have been especially overlooked. This third paper in the Lancet Men's Health Series examines why men's health has received so little policy attention and proposes strategies to raise men's health on national a
Despite long-standing evidence of poor health and life expectancy outcomes among men, particularly among men who are socially or structurally marginalised, men's health has generally received little and uneven attention in health policy and practice. Its gendered and intersectional aspects have been especially overlooked. This third paper in the Lancet Men's Health Series examines why men's health has received so little policy attention and proposes strategies to raise men's health on national and global agendas. We applied a gender lens to the 3-i theory-based framework and analysed how ideas, interests, and institutions shape the prioritisation of men's health within national and global policy agendas. We review the modest development of men's health policies and assess how power and politics, including the roles of a range of stakeholders from global and national health spaces, commercial actors, and civil society organisations, have shaped the construction of the problem as well as policy attention and framing, resource allocation, and interventions. The scarcity of attention paid to men's health on global and national agendas reflects how power operates through ideas and institutions which contribute to the conflation of gender with women, institutional inertia, and contested constructions of individual versus structural drivers of ill health. We highlight how this has created a space in which commercial actors, including the manosphere, can shape narratives and influence men's health in ways that align with commercial or ideological interests. We conclude by proposing politically informed strategies that recognise how power, institutional arrangements, and competing interests shape men's health policy within prevailing gender and structural orders. We identify entry points for advancing men's health equity and wellbeing that draw on empirical evidence and technical guidance, are grounded in political realities, and are consistent with a commitment to gender justice for all people.
